Our writer closes the door back into the Law a little more tightly by showing there is but one High Priest whom God will accept, and that one does not stand in Herod's Temple. Further, he warns the spiritual reality of things has eluded them completely, because they have refused to grow beyond their poor Hellenized Judaism.
While there may be some debate about the absolute accuracy of it, the various rabbinical colleges all had a copy of the roll of High Priests, going all the way back to Aaron. Each man's name, lineage, and some words about his service, etc., were included in this roll. Some of them were quite famous, offering exemplary service during their term of office. Some were equally infamous for their failures.
The office of High Priest was conceptually fuzzy in our minds. In standard Hebrew fashion, the logic is symbolic, not concrete, not merely a matter of metaphor or allegory. Spiritual truth is hardly explained, only exemplified within a context. The calling of High Priest was at the behest of God. He set forth the original calling of Aaron, and commanded how this office would be carried on by future generations. Obviously no single man in this fallen world could live forever, so the office had to pass from one man to the next. There must always be a man in the office for as long as the Covenant of the Law stood.
Because these were humans, chosen from among the Nation of Israel, they could empathize with the human failings which bound Israelis in their sins. He could serve in his representative office before God Almighty because he was called to it by God, but did so with a human heart no less fallen than those whose offerings and burdens he presented. He had to offer covering sacrifices for his own sins before attempting to offer them for others. Were he not called into the divine Presence by God, He would be stricken dead immediately. Often enough the sins of the nation caused this anyway. At this, it was not literally God's presence, but merely an earthly representation of such a presence. It was an earthly model of God's throne room in Heaven. Yet, for the sake of sufficient sin, the High Priest could well expire on the Day of Atonement when he carried the blood sacrifice into that little room with the wooden box coated with gold leaf and mythical sculptures. He was just a man representing other men to a God no man could see.
Again, this was by God's command. All the desire in the world could not make a man High Priest. It was an ironclad birthright issue. By Hebrew logic, this took away any pride a man might have, for what did he do to merit such an office? It was not possible to wear the vestments by merit, but by grace alone, by God's command. So it was with Christ. He came to Israel by God's command. Further, He came not merely as one of the Jews, but as the Son of God who commanded. Our writer quotes again the coronation song, Psalm 2, which bears a Messianic truth. If the Davidic king could be called a son of God, how much more so the Messiah Himself, the one who was both anchor and end of the House of David?
Many of the mystical connotations of David's reign are tied up in the Messiah. The writer quotes also Psalm 110. We are reminded David was permitted to touch the Ark of the Covenant. While under that covenant for which the Ark existed, it was forbidden. He was permitted because he somehow had seized upon the faith and covenant which came much earlier, and still stood. The Covenant of Abraham, which included Melchizedek, both as men of faith who had fully committed their lives to Jehovah, was of a much higher order than the Law. We note the Law was merely an outward expression of what holiness would be under strictly circumscribed limits: that people, that land, that time. It was not the ultimate revelation of holiness, but was actually a very poor reflection of it. While very much binding on the Nation of Israel, it could never save souls. That was a matter of faith, of commitment as a gift of grace. When David embraced that level of faith, the Law was fulfilled. More, he could approach the Ark, the symbolic Throne of Jehovah, directly himself, as if he were a High Priest of some other order. That was the prior order of Melchizedek, the order of Abrahamic faith.
Thus, in that Psalm, David reveals an oracle of God which named him as a High Priest of that other, older order. This was the reason why this and other Psalms sound God's command all the world should bow before His King on earth. Not as King of Israel, though it was dressed in that robe, but as King of Faith, the faith Israel was meant to have, but rejected. Still, that faith was at work, and it wrought the Messiah. These were prophecies of the Coming One, who would be God's own Son, and High Priest of Faith. This was Christ Jesus.
While on the earth as a man, this Jesus was a vastly superior High Priest, for His offering never failed. When He stood before the Throne of God, He was there as Son. His appeals for mercy were surely granted, for God was granting them to Himself. Waxing yet more lyrical, the writer tosses in an old play on words in Greek. It was a common game to combine two similar sounding words in Greek or Latin as a phrase which encouraged some virtue, or made some pithy statement. Here he uses emathan and epathen -- "learning is suffering." Jesus didn't learn how to obey; obedience to God was His very nature. Rather, He learned that obedience was suffering, a very Hebrew concept. To gain was to grow, to be changed, to cut off things of the past, to leave behind the comfort of the womb. In short, the trauma of birth itself was hidden in learning by experience. What a man hears, he knows. What he sees, he understands. What he experiences, he is.
Summing all this up with His life, pulling together all the unfinished threads of human history and God's promises, He redeemed all mankind. As He is even now High Priest in Heaven, any other man claiming that role is a blasphemer. The standing High Priest so-called in Herod's Temple at that moment was a fake. For this Hebrew audience in Rome, our writer warns there is no place to go if they leave Jesus.
On the cusp of further explaining the image of Melchizedek, the author stops; he pulls his readers up short in their headlong rush back to the comforts of a familiar Judaism. He's wary of explaining because his readers are weary of hearing. After this many years of walking in Christ and reclaiming their true Hebrew identity, they still remain mere Jews of that latter day corrupt Judaism. They had not traveled back into the land of parabolic truth, of symbolic logic, of things which cannot be taught, only caught by the spirit enlightened by the Spirit of God. They were sucklings, tender and fat of soul. No wonder persecution was so hard on them. What infant is ready to face hardship? These readers were unable to sift the truth from the mystical viewpoint of the old Hebrew mind. They were still hardly grasping concrete toys of mere human logic with clumsy grasping little hands. They knew the nursing of simple ideas, but the meat of truth was not something they recognized as food.
Return to Hebrews
Index
[<-- Previous]
[Next -->]
Ed Hurst
19 March 2008
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: People of honor need no copyright laws; they are only too happy to give credit where credit is due. Others will ignore copyright laws whenever they please. If you are of the latter, please note what Moses said about dishonorable behavior -- "be sure your sin will find you out" (Numbers 32:23)